A A A

Archive

June 24, 2017

In a recent column, I wrote about the decision of the Supreme Court in Roy vs. Herbosa (G.R. No. 207246, November 22, 2016) where it settled, with finality, that the term “capital” under Section 11 Article XII of the 1987 Constitution only “refers to the voting stock or controlling interest of a corporation”—no more, no less. The Roy case stemmed from a statement in its predecessor case, Gamboa... Read More
Kate Aubrey G. Hojilla

June 15, 2017

Leading lawyer, judge, and writer Justice Robert A. Jackson once said: “[f]reedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order.” Touching the very heart of the existing order is the issue on same-sex marriage or -- more accurately --... Read More
Kate Aubrey G. Hojilla

June 15, 2017

Leading lawyer, judge, and writer Justice Robert A. Jackson once said: “[f]reedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order.” Touching the very heart of the existing order is the issue on same-sex marriage or -- more accurately --... Read More